Rethinking the City

Easy to read, Sadler tells us in his own words what psychogeography is. Situationism according to Sadler, and no I will not quote him, though it comes from his own words so how I cannot quote him I cannot possibly comprehend how to do, is a frequent play of different things, between small and big space, bright and not paying your electric bill, breathing and suffocating. Both Sadler and McDonough talk about that one picture called The Naked City. Both Sadler and McDonough talked about how situationist space is not merely a concept but a flexible reality that is very much having to do with your interactions with others lives. Sadler explained The Naked City better than McDonough because McDonough is a wuss and does not want to use The Naked City as a dramatic and clear visual example of a typical situationist perspective but as a means of furrowing his brow against things he does not like, as in the layout of Paris, clearly because he feeds on his furrowing. However, Sadler was not all that different from McDonough -- you see, they both in fact similarly discoursed on the Derive, of who's e with a accent mark I cannot for the life of me generate visually on this typographical machine in this new day and age where I could easily copy and paste it from elsewhere. Now, blindly, I will inform you that both pieces help you with an understanding of how situationists think about architecture, even though the point Sadler made virtually on the first page was that situationist space had almost nothing to do with the architecture but with the aforementioned differences in space relating to the lives of people. Perhaps situationists would take to Rastafarianism seeing as they want to live a non-restricted lifestyle, as is clearly implied by the language they use in their pieces. Both Sadler and McDonough think that status has nothing to do with people since they are all people and they are in fact the same, regardless of their differences, or of how little it may seem that I understood or even read Sadler's piece.
Question 1: Why don't Sadler and McDonough get hitched (in blatant disregard to their living status)?
Question 2: Why does everything I said sound like everything someone else said?
Question 3 (true or false): this class has a vivid understanding of situationist space.