1. In Anne Wagner's article, she claims that Matta- Clark's Splitting construction is a physical site, a house. My question is that since we as the viewers can only see full architecture through photos (documentation), is Matta-Clark creating such work as a spectacle or as a physical sculpture architectural project due to its documentary characteristic?
2. According to Graham, architecture has both the aesthetic and economic values. However, Splitting seems to be an exception because you can only see the inside of the building from photographs. Under such condition, can Clark's Splitting be considered as architecture based on Graham's definition?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment