Q2. Carvell believes that television " has not yet come of age aesthetically" and he goes on to discuss it more throughout the article. The aesthetics of something and in this case television are subjective; not everyone will have the same opinion of what should and shouldn't be considered having an aesthetic quality, so what does it mean to be aesthetically pleasing? What is the criteria?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment