Q1: Why did Guggenheim decide to accept Haacke's art after turned him down 15 years ago? Was it because the way people view art change over time? Would the viewers view this piece differently than they way they would do in 1985? If he had written some sort of explanations back then, maybe more people would accept this art work?
Question 2: I wonder that could Haacke's work consider to be site specific if it were shown outside in the public space in the city? Would it have a more powerful effect on the viewers?
No comments:
Post a Comment