Q1: Guggenheim initially turned away Haacke's art and then 15 years later accepted it. What were the reasons for the museum turning him down? Did they n0t think people would like it? Did they not think people would accept is as art? Why did the museum then accept his art 15 years later?
Q2: Would the Guggenheim Museum have been more accepting the first time Haacke submitted his real estate art if he would have explained his idea and meaning behind his artwork instead of just leaving it up to the viewers? Would they have understood the way they did in 1985 if he would have provided a written explanation to accompany the artwork?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment